Saturday, 21 March 2015
Wednesday, 18 March 2015
Director's Interpretation
AS Drama and Theatre Studies - Unit 2
Part B
Attempts
on her Life
Director’s Interpretation - Jack Hughes
Martin Crimp’s ‘17
scenarios for the theatre’ dispense with plot and character altogether but are,
nevertheless, a compelling catalogue of late twentieth century fixations. With
themes ranging from suicide to ethnic cleansing, terrorism to talk shows its
disturbing assortment of nameless narrators are attempting to come up with a story
that speaks of a society in free fall.
Attempts on her
Life was first presented at the Royal Court Theatre Upstairs, London, on the 7th
March 1997. It was revived in the Lyttelton auditorium of the National Theatre,
London, on the 8th March 2007. Eight years on from Katie Mitchell’s
version, the play is still hugely relevant and could even be seen as a prophetic
piece about the schizophrenic nature of contemporary Western life. To quote the
playwright:
‘I don’t know what the next
big thing is – maybe it will be good, not bad. I don’t think it has happened
yet. So this play, is surfing along a wave which is still growing,
still arriving.’
(Martin Crimp, NT Education Pack, 2007)
The overall concept
of this director’s interpretation comes from the idea that, just as in modern
life, the forces of good and evil can be hard to distinguish,the identity and
objectives of the central character are likewise blurred. Is Anne an Artist, a business woman, cult leader, suicide victim,
casualty of war, psychopath, terrorist, pornographer, megastar, killer or a
brand of car? We don’t even know if her name is really Anne...it could be Anny,
Annie, Anya. We assume that this person is guilty, but of what, we never find
out. The notion that one can wage war on a belief system or put a concept on
trial is very much a part of our society’s current outlook. Yet the reality of
such a legal process is as brutal, absurd and fraught with difficulty as the one
dreamed up by Kafka. So this production had to take the form of an absurd and
nightmarish presentation of evidence, drawing on the influences of Artaud and
the surrealists in which, to quote Strindberg:
‘The characters split,
double, multiply, evaporate, condense, dissolve and merge. But one
consciousness rules them all: the dreamer's; for him there are no secrets, no
inconsistencies, no scruples and no laws. He does not judge or acquit, he
merely relates’
(August Strindberg, A Dream Play, 1907)
Martin
Crimp’s work defies logic and resists explanation leaving the director with great
scope to experiment and play within the rules and structure of the text. The
playwright said that directors who approach the text ‘must have a sense of
humour. A sense of irony. A sense of fun. A sense of despair. Those are the
things that are required.’ and my vision for the piece attempts to
reflect that.
(Martin Crimp, NT Education Pack, 2007)
On
first reading it became apparent that the piece, though still immensely
relevant, is of its time in that it portrays the concerns of Western society at
the end of the 20th century. It is specifically set in the here and
now of 1997, which is, coincidentally, the year that many of the students in
this cohort were born. This seemed somehow significant, in that it is
describing a world that these students never knew but are a product of. A world
in which mobile phones were rare, people smoked on public transport and the
worldwide web was an esoteric subculture populated by anoraks and academics. It
seemed important to root the play in this era in terms of visual imagery, music
and cultural references and yet I felt that the cast themselves, being the
children of 1997, would bring their own inherent modernity to it. In this piece
you will hear 90’s indie, house and gangster rap, see images of child soldiers,
suicide cults, genocide and political triumph and be bombarded with a sense of
a culture spiralling towards the end of a violent and explosive century.
In
Crimp’s most recent play, ‘In the Republic of Happiness’ (Royal Court Theatre
2012), all the actors learnt all the lines and spoke whenever they felt the
impulse to chime in. This was much too difficult a principle to entertain with
my students, yet I was keen to work in a free and collaborative way that
encouraged improvisation and experimentation. For this reason, lines were not
fixed from the start and scenes were shaped and developed by what each actor
brought to the sessions: physically, technically and vocally.
I have encouraged the adoption of some
characterisation within this characterless play in order for the students to
showcase their acting skills and have attempted to impose a type of narrative
on a self consciously storyless piece, in order to present an abridged version
of Crimp’s master work. All actors are on stage all the time and take it in
turns to speak.
The running order of scenes is as
follows:
1. ALL
MESSAGES DELETED
– In which the themes, images and ‘characters’ that will later be described are
introduced. Anne’s body is seen circumscribed by police chalk as her
answer phone messages are played back and her last memories relived. But is she
the murder victim or the murderer?
2. FAITH
IN OURSELVES
– A beautiful landscape is described in which life is so precious, so felt,even
the trees have names. People are seen tending the earth, preparing the soil for planting. But the harmony of generations is
destroyed and it becomes unclear whether the holes they are digging are for
planting trees or bodies.
3. THE
OCCUPIER
– A TV interview in three dimensions, in which we try to work out just what
kind of person Anne is.
4. THE
CAMERA LOVES YOU
– A pop song, a fashion show, an in your face advert. Anne is so delicious
every one must get their share.
5. MUM
AND DAD
– Why does Anne always carry that big red bag? Why is she always travelling?
Set in the therapy room of a mental hospital we leaf the through the holiday
brochure that is Anne’s life.
6. THE
NEW ANNY
– Test drive the new Anny. She handles like a dream.
7. THE
THREAT OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM – A thug, a business woman, a
schoolgirl, a psychiatrist, a terrorist, a checkout girl and a soldier give
their evidence in the case of the state vs Anne.
8. UNTITLED
(100 WORDS)
– A private view at a contemporary Art gallery. Eight critics pick apart a work
of Art that pushes the boundaries of what is acceptable.
9. THE
GIRL NEXT DOOR
– A gangster rap video that delivers the final verdict on just who Anne is. But
how will she be sentenced?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)